This page consolidates user‑reported experiences about MEXC risk control, including withdrawal restrictions and extended reviews. It also documents, in detail, what @fair_trader_x reports about his account (UID 63218153) — from withdrawal attempts and KYC requests to legal correspondence and outreach to regulators.
A common pattern in reports describes an account placed under “risk control,” followed by extensive documentation requests and prolonged review windows before any withdrawal is allowed.
These items were reportedly emailed during the 254th day of an ongoing freeze.
Some communications referenced a plan to refund only the principal after EDD (approx. $125,000 in one case), while keeping the non‑principal amounts frozen pending investigation.
All points above reflect user‑provided materials and correspondence excerpts. Readers should request an official statement from the platform for a balanced view.
Below is a synthesis of recurring claims from public posts and private letters provided for this dossier.
This section compiles allegations and public notices referenced in the materials. It is not a court finding. Always verify with primary sources.
We present claims and excerpts for public interest and review. Readers should seek direct statements from MEXC and relevant regulators for the current, definitive status.
Reports indicate multiple rejected withdrawals despite prior basic verification; additional selfie with passport and UID/date requested.
Deposit reportedly originated in ETH and was spot‑exchanged to USDT.
Another trader’s message describes $100,000 frozen and subsequent blacklisting after private messages seeking help.
Questions sought confirmation of: platform operations, client status, that the account was under risk control, and whether inviting clients to Singapore for in‑person KYC is a normal practice. Response reportedly affirmed only client status + risk control, leaving other items unanswered.
Awaiting non‑automatic response; related materials forwarded to police per later updates.
Six‑item EDD checklist sent by email; separate message referenced a plan to refund the principal after EDD while keeping non‑principal frozen during the investigation.
Follow‑ups indicate forwarding to law enforcement and pending officer correspondence.
UID 63218153; public hashtags included #MEXCFreeze, #MEXCRiskControl, #MEXCUserFundsFrozen. Several posts reference other traders and community groups aggregating similar experiences.
We compile user experiences and public notices referenced in user‑provided letters. Legitimacy determinations depend on current licensing and regulatory status in each jurisdiction; consult official registries and seek the exchange’s formal statement.
Some materials and notices use terms like “suspected fraud” in connection with “MEXC.” These are allegations and alerts; not court verdicts. Readers should verify the latest regulator publications and company responses.
Reports mention durations up to 365 days in certain cases. Timelines vary by investigation and documentation completeness.
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) may be triggered by risk rules. Users report requests for identity, income, address, tax filings, and transaction justifications even when deposits were previously accepted.
Some messages reference invites to Singapore or meetings in Hong Kong; users raise concerns about licensing and safety when asked to travel cross‑border for verification.
This page summarizes user‑provided posts, letters, and screenshots attributed to @fair_trader_x. All third‑party mentions reflect the author’s statements. For balance, we encourage contacting the platform and checking regulator registries for current status.